| |
| LOE ID: |
4346 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Algae |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Nuisance |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. |
| Data Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
|
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Unspecified |
| Temporal Representation: |
Unspecified |
| Environmental Conditions: |
Unspecified |
| QAPP Information: |
Unspecified |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
4347 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Sedimentation/Siltation |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. |
| Data Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Unspecified |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Unspecified |
| Guideline Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Unspecified |
| Temporal Representation: |
Unspecified |
| Environmental Conditions: |
Unspecified |
| QAPP Information: |
Unspecified |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
4348 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Selenium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. |
| Data Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Unspecified |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Unspecified |
| Guideline Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Unspecified |
| Temporal Representation: |
Unspecified |
| Environmental Conditions: |
Unspecified |
| QAPP Information: |
Unspecified |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
4349 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Trash |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Visual |
| Matrix: |
-N/A |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. |
| Data Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
|
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Unspecified |
| Temporal Representation: |
Unspecified |
| Environmental Conditions: |
Unspecified |
| QAPP Information: |
Unspecified |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
28630 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Algae |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Narrative Description Data |
| Matrix: |
Not Specified |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
A TMDL has been established for this water segment-pollutant combination. The Malibu Creek Watershed Nutrient TMDL was established by USEPA on March 21, 2003. |
| Data Reference: |
Staff report, appendix, and letter to SWRCB and Los Angeles RWQCB establishing a TMDL for Nutrients in the Malibu Creek Watershed. |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
|
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
|
| Temporal Representation: |
|
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
QA information unavailable. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
28713 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Invasive Species |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat | Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species | Wetland Habitat | Wildlife Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
A total of one of three sites showed an increase in density of mud snails over the three years of sampling (2006, 2007, 2008) and three of three sites sampled showed medium or high densities of mud snail in 2008. |
| Data Reference: |
New Zealand Mudsnail Surveys July 2006, July 2007 and October 2008 Santa Monica Mountains. Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission / Santa Monica Baykeeper.
|
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Basin Plan states that: "All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant or animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analysis of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, bioassays of appropriate duration or other appropriate methods as specified by the State or Regional Board. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
Basin Plan Amendments to the Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan as of 02/02/2009 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Presence of high densities and increasing densities. While quantitative and predictive research continues, due to its ability to attain extremely high densities, the impacts of the mudsnails on aquatic ecosystems where it occurs in the western U.S. are large and include: decreased densities of native macroinvertebrates and reduced food resources; decreased whole-stream algal production; poor food source in that mudsnails are much more difficult to digest, with their hard shells and operculum than are the thin-shelled, native pulmonate snails that do not have opercula or than soft-bodied, aquatic insect larvae. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The New Zealand Mudsnail Invades the Western United States. Aquatic Nuisance Species Digest Volume 4 No. 4. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Four sites were sampled in the following locations in Medea Creek Reach 2: Conifer St. under bridge on left side; Chumash Park; Cornell at Kanan Rd; and the outlet at Paramount Ranch. |
| Temporal Representation: |
All sites were sampled in July of 2006, July of 2007 and October of 2008. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Data was collected as detailed in the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission and Santa Monica Baykeeper New Zealand Mudsnail Surveys. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
New Zealand Mudsnail Surveys July 2006, July 2007 and October 2008 Santa Monica Mountains. Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission / Santa Monica Baykeeper.
|
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
30181 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Invasive Species |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat | Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species | Wetland Habitat | Wildlife Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
The IBI scores at these sites ranked in the very poor range (13 and 10) in the spring and very poor (11 and 10) in the fall. |
| Data Reference: |
Malibu Watershed 2005 Bioassessment Monitoring Report. (2005) The Malibu Creek Watershed Monitoring Program City of Calabasas, Environmental Services Division. Submitted by: Aquatic Bioassay and Consulting Laboratories. |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Basin Plan states that: "All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant or animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analysis of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, bioassays of appropriate duration or other appropriate methods as specified by the State or Regional Board. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
Basin Plan Amendments to the Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan as of 02/02/2009 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The IBI is a multi-metric assessment that employs biological metrics that respond to a habitat or water quality impairment. Each of the biological metrics measured at a site are converted to an IBI score then summed. These cumulative scores are then ranked as very good (80-100), good (60-79), fair (40-49), poor (20-39) and very poor (0-19) habitat conditions. Sites with scores below 39 are considered to have impaired conditions. |
| Guideline Reference: |
A Quantitative Tool for Assessing the Integrity of Southern Coastal California Streams. Environmental Management Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 493-504. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Two sites in Medea Creek were sampled, MED1 above the confluence with Lindero Creek at 34° 10.180' N 118° 45.762' W and MED2 near the confluence with Malibu Creek at 34° 06.865' N 118° 45.328' W. |
| Temporal Representation: |
Sites were sampled in Spring and Fall of 2005 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate populations and IBI scores may also be affected by a wide range of anthropogenic stressors. |
| QAPP Information: |
Data was collected in compliance with California Stream Bioassessment Procedure. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
California Stream Bioassessment Procedure (Protocol Brief for Biological and Physical/Habitat Assessment in Wadeable Streams) California Department of Fish and Game Water Pollution Control Laboratory Aquatic Bioassessment Laboratory Revision Date - December, 2003 |
| |
DECISION ID |
16625 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Invasive Species |
| Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Sources: |
Nonpoint Source | Point Source |
| Expected TMDL Completion Date: |
2021 |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Weight of Evidence: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.10 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.10, waters are listed when a declining trend in water quality is substantiated.
Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. One of 4 sites showed an increase in density of mud snails over the three years of sampling (2006, 2007, 2008) and 4 out of 4 sites sampled showed medium or high densities of mud snail in 2008.
At high numbers, mud snails can completely cover a stream bed and damage local stream ecosystems. The colonies outcompete native aquatic invertebrates that the watersheds fish and amphibians rely on for food, disrupting the entire food web.
Benthic macroinvertebrates as measured by Southern California IBI (index of biological integrity) in Medea Creek were very poor in 2005 indicating impairment of benthic community structure.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. Data was collected over a three years time frame and a baseline condition of zero abundance of the invasive species was used.
3. One of three sites showed an increase in density of mud snails over a three years of sampling and three of three sites sampled showed medium or high densities of mud snail in 2008.
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met. |
| |
| RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem. |
| |
| SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation: |
|
| |
| USEPA Decision: |
|
| |
| |
Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 16625 |
| |
| LOE ID: |
30181 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Invasive Species |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat | Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species | Wetland Habitat | Wildlife Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
The IBI scores at these sites ranked in the very poor range (13 and 10) in the spring and very poor (11 and 10) in the fall. |
| Data Reference: |
Malibu Watershed 2005 Bioassessment Monitoring Report. (2005) The Malibu Creek Watershed Monitoring Program City of Calabasas, Environmental Services Division. Submitted by: Aquatic Bioassay and Consulting Laboratories. |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Basin Plan states that: "All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant or animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analysis of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, bioassays of appropriate duration or other appropriate methods as specified by the State or Regional Board. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
Basin Plan Amendments to the Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan as of 02/02/2009 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The IBI is a multi-metric assessment that employs biological metrics that respond to a habitat or water quality impairment. Each of the biological metrics measured at a site are converted to an IBI score then summed. These cumulative scores are then ranked as very good (80-100), good (60-79), fair (40-49), poor (20-39) and very poor (0-19) habitat conditions. Sites with scores below 39 are considered to have impaired conditions. |
| Guideline Reference: |
A Quantitative Tool for Assessing the Integrity of Southern Coastal California Streams. Environmental Management Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 493-504. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Two sites in Medea Creek were sampled, MED1 above the confluence with Lindero Creek at 34° 10.180' N 118° 45.762' W and MED2 near the confluence with Malibu Creek at 34° 06.865' N 118° 45.328' W. |
| Temporal Representation: |
Sites were sampled in Spring and Fall of 2005 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate populations and IBI scores may also be affected by a wide range of anthropogenic stressors. |
| QAPP Information: |
Data was collected in compliance with California Stream Bioassessment Procedure. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
California Stream Bioassessment Procedure (Protocol Brief for Biological and Physical/Habitat Assessment in Wadeable Streams) California Department of Fish and Game Water Pollution Control Laboratory Aquatic Bioassessment Laboratory Revision Date - December, 2003 |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
28713 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Invasive Species |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat | Preservation of Rare & Endangered Species | Wetland Habitat | Wildlife Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
A total of one of three sites showed an increase in density of mud snails over the three years of sampling (2006, 2007, 2008) and three of three sites sampled showed medium or high densities of mud snail in 2008. |
| Data Reference: |
New Zealand Mudsnail Surveys July 2006, July 2007 and October 2008 Santa Monica Mountains. Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission / Santa Monica Baykeeper.
|
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Basin Plan states that: "All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant or animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analysis of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, bioassays of appropriate duration or other appropriate methods as specified by the State or Regional Board. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
Basin Plan Amendments to the Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan as of 02/02/2009 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Presence of high densities and increasing densities. While quantitative and predictive research continues, due to its ability to attain extremely high densities, the impacts of the mudsnails on aquatic ecosystems where it occurs in the western U.S. are large and include: decreased densities of native macroinvertebrates and reduced food resources; decreased whole-stream algal production; poor food source in that mudsnails are much more difficult to digest, with their hard shells and operculum than are the thin-shelled, native pulmonate snails that do not have opercula or than soft-bodied, aquatic insect larvae. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The New Zealand Mudsnail Invades the Western United States. Aquatic Nuisance Species Digest Volume 4 No. 4. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Four sites were sampled in the following locations in Medea Creek Reach 2: Conifer St. under bridge on left side; Chumash Park; Cornell at Kanan Rd; and the outlet at Paramount Ranch. |
| Temporal Representation: |
All sites were sampled in July of 2006, July of 2007 and October of 2008. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Data was collected as detailed in the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission and Santa Monica Baykeeper New Zealand Mudsnail Surveys. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
New Zealand Mudsnail Surveys July 2006, July 2007 and October 2008 Santa Monica Mountains. Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission / Santa Monica Baykeeper.
|
| |
DECISION ID |
7344 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Algae |
| Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (being addressed by USEPA approved TMDL) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006) |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Sources: |
Agriculture-animal | Atmospheric Deposition | Golf course activities | Groundwater Loadings | Irrigated Crop Production | Major Municipal Point Source-dry and/or wet weather discharge | Onsite Wastewater Systems (Septic Tanks) | Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers |
| TMDL Name: |
Malibu Creek Nutrients |
| TMDL Project Code: |
239 |
| Date TMDL Approved by USEPA: |
03/21/2003 |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Weight of Evidence: |
This pollutant is being considered for removal on the section 303(d) list under sections 2.2 of the Listing Policy. Under 2.2 of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status.
Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list. There is sufficient justification to place it in the Being Addressed portion of the 303(d) list because a TMDL has been established by USEPA, and is expected to result in attainment of the standard. |
| |
| RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the Water Quality Limited Segments Being Addressed category of the section 303(d) list because a TMDL has been established by USEPA, and applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem. |
| |
| SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation: |
N/A |
| |
| USEPA Decision: |
|
| |
| |
Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 7344 |
| |
| LOE ID: |
4346 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Algae |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Nuisance |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. |
| Data Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
|
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Unspecified |
| Temporal Representation: |
Unspecified |
| Environmental Conditions: |
Unspecified |
| QAPP Information: |
Unspecified |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
28630 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Algae |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Narrative Description Data |
| Matrix: |
Not Specified |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
A TMDL has been established for this water segment-pollutant combination. The Malibu Creek Watershed Nutrient TMDL was established by USEPA on March 21, 2003. |
| Data Reference: |
Staff report, appendix, and letter to SWRCB and Los Angeles RWQCB establishing a TMDL for Nutrients in the Malibu Creek Watershed. |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
|
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
|
| Temporal Representation: |
|
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
QA information unavailable. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |